Hmm, tja, was soll man dazu sagen...
Den USA wird wohl egal sein, was die Inspektoren finden, weil es nun mal nicht um die Waffen geht, sondern um Öl usw.
Wenn es um Massenvernichtungswaffen ginge,
würde man wohl zuerst Nordkorea angreifen müssen.
Die machen mir btw viel mehr Angst als der Irak.

Eine gute Seite ist auch www.thenation.com
Ich zitiere mal:

No Room for Logic in Bush Foreign Policy

Darn, but those weapons of mass destruction keep turning up in the wrong places.


Forward air bases, Army infantry units, a hospital ship and docile yet combat-trained reporters are all being readied for a "regime change" war against Iraq promoted as a way to rid the world of an arsenal Saddam Hussein doesn't seem to have.

That United Nations inspectors, even after American intelligence briefings, are coming up empty-handed is embarrassing enough, but then North Korea had to steal the show by taking the wraps off its far more advanced nuclear weapons program.

That's pretty scary because American intelligence agencies believe that bizarre, unpredictable North Korea already has enough plutonium and tested bomb technology for one or two functioning nuclear warheads that can easily be lobbed at our ally South Korea, home base of 37,000 US soldiers. Pyongyang in 1998 fired one of its long-range Taepodong missiles over Japanese territory. American intelligence officials believe that the regime is working on missiles capable of reaching Hawaii and beyond.

Yet we have made it clear we are not planning to go to war with North Korea.

"We have no hostile intent toward North Korea, and we hope they will come to their senses," Secretary of State Colin Powell said Sunday. He later added that "nobody is mobilizing armies, nobody is threatening each other yet."

Powell went on to say: "Let's take this patiently. Let's take it with deliberation. Let's work with our friends and allies."